瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚在老年髋部骨折全身麻醉中的应用比较
首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院南充医院(南充市中心医院)
目的 比较瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚在老年髋部骨折全身麻醉手术患者中的应用效果。方法 回顾性选取2024年1月至2025年6月期间本院收治的共计102例老年髋部骨折全身麻醉手术患者,以麻醉用药的不同分组,丙泊酚组51例采用丙泊酚麻醉,瑞马唑仑组51例采用瑞马唑仑麻醉,比较两组患者不同时间点生命体征及呼吸抑制指标,统计不良反应发生率、术后神志恢复时间、术后谵妄发生率。结果 两组患者麻醉前(T0)的心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),瑞马唑仑组麻醉后1 min(T1)、插管后1 min(T2)、插管后10 min(T3)的HR、MAP水平较丙泊酚组更高(P<0.05);两组患者T0、T2、T3的呼吸频率(RR)及血氧饱和度(SpO2)比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),T1的SpO2比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),瑞马唑仑组T1的RR水平较丙泊酚组更高(P<0.05);两组患者不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);瑞马唑仑组术后呼吸恢复时间、定向力恢复时间、睁眼时间较丙泊酚组更短(P<0.05);两组患者术后谵妄发生率、谵妄评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚在老年髋部骨折全身麻醉手术患者中的应用均具有较高安全性,不易造成术后谵妄,但瑞马唑仑更能够维持生命体征稳定,减轻呼吸抑制,缩短术后神志恢复时间。
Objective To compare the efficacy of remimazolam and propofol in elderly patients undergoing general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery. Methods A total of 102 elderly patients with hip fractures from January 2024 to June 2025 who underwent general anesthesia in our hospital were retrospectively selected. Based on the anesthetic agents used, 51 patients in the propofol group were administered propofol, while 51 patients in the remimazolam group received remimazolam. Vital signs and respiratory suppression indicators at different time points were compared in both groups, and the incidence of adverse reactions, postoperative consciousness recovery time, and postoperative delirium rates were recorded. Results In heart rate(HR) and mean arterial pressure(MAP) before anesthesia(T0), both groups were no statistically significant differences(P>0.05). In comparison of the propofol group, the HR and MAP levels in the remimazolam group were higher at 1 minute after anesthesia(T1), 1 minute after intubation(T2), and 10 minutes after intubation(T3)(P<0.05). In respiratory rate(RR) and oxygen saturation(SpO2) at T0, T2, and T3, both groups were no statistically significant differences(P>0.05). The SpO2 difference at T1 was no statistically significant(P>0.05), but in comparison of the propofol group, the RR level in the remimazolam group was higher at T1(P<0.05). In the incidence of adverse reactions, both groups were no statistically significant differences(P>0.05). In the postoperative recovery times for respiration, orientation, and eye opening, in comparison of the propofol group, the remimazolam group was shorter(P<0.05). In postoperative delirium rates or delirium scores, both groups were no statistically significant differences(P>0.05). Conclusion Both remimazolam and propofol demonstrate high safety in elderly patients undergoing general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery, with a low risk of postoperative delirium. However, remimazolam better maintains hemodynamic stability, reduces respiratory depression, and shortens postoperative consciousness recovery time.
引用本文
按标准格式复制,或导出到文献管理软件参考文献
共 11 条- [1]严金平,何林杰,叶凌.腰硬联合麻醉对老年髋部骨折手术患者疼痛和认知功能的影响[J].浙江创伤外科,2025,30(9):1618-1620.
- [2]黎定明.盐酸右美托咪定腰-硬联合麻醉在老年髋部骨折围手术期的效果[J].西藏医药,2025,46(3):50-51.
- [3]张岳春,高洪琴.舒芬太尼复合丙泊酚对老年髋部骨折手术患者的血流动力学及麻醉效果的影响[J].中外医学研究,2025,23(20):55-58.
- [4]倪玮玮,毛雪娣.苯磺酸瑞马唑仑在老年髋部骨折手术中的应用效果探讨[J].医药前沿,2025,15(15):62-64.
- [5]中国老年医学学会骨与关节分会创伤骨科学术工作委员会.老年髋部骨折诊疗专家共识(2017)[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2017,19(11):921-927.
- [6]Inouye SK,Kosar CM,Tommet D,et al. The CAM-S:de-velopment and validation of a new scoring system for deliriumseverity in 2 cohorts[J]. Ann Intern Med,2014,160(8):526-533.
- [7]王佳,卢玉蓉,任昕,等.脊椎麻醉与全身麻醉在老年髋部骨折手术患者中的长期疗效对比研究[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2025,24(3):334-337.
- [8]曾敏,胡兢,余树春.右美托咪定与丙泊酚对老年下肢骨折椎管内麻醉患者血流动力学及认知功能的影响[J].哈尔滨医药,2025,45(1):59-61.
- [9]刘旭,赵志莉,沈丹,等.不同剂量瑞马唑仑对四肢手术患者苏醒期谵妄及术后嗜睡的影响[J].新乡医学院学报,2025,42(8):664-668.
- [10]凌斌,朱芸.瑞马唑仑和丙泊酚在老年全麻腹腔镜胆囊手术中应用比较[J].哈尔滨医药,2025,45(3):80-82.
- [11]马艳文,张杰.瑞马唑仑麻醉对老年髋部骨折全麻手术患者术后谵妄的影响[J].医药论坛杂志,2024,45(19):2107-2111.
| 文章编号 | 2026-02-029(期号内编号) |
|---|---|
| 栏目 | 临床药物与手术治疗 |
| 作者 | 袁圆;李松;蔡雪敏 |
| 作者单位 | 首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院南充医院(南充市中心医院) |
| 中图分类号 | R614.2 |
| 卷期页码 | 2026, 2(02): 113-116 |
| 发布时间 | 2026-03-15 |
| 出版时间 | 2026-03-15 |
| 引用信息 | [1]袁圆,李松,蔡雪敏.瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚在老年髋部骨折全身麻醉中的应用比较[J].疾病预防与控制,2026,2(02):113-116. |
| 全文地址 | 在知网查看该文(kns.cnki.net) |
| 数据抓取时间 | 2026-09-22T12:22:15 |