ISSN 2097-5724 CN 61-1535/R 主管·主办:陕西省疾病预防控制中心
疾病预防与控制 Disease Prevention and Control 医学学术期刊 双月刊
2025-04-072 检验与方法 2025, (04)

胃大部切除术毕Ⅱ式吻合后吻合口炎症及溃疡发生率的研究

贵州正安县人民医院

16下载次数 0被引频次 24阅读次数 0参考文献
知网阅读全文
摘要

目的 探讨胃大部切除术毕 II 式吻合后吻合口炎症及溃疡发生率的研究效果。方法 选取 2021 年 1 月至 2024 年 6 月期间 80 例行腹腔镜远端胃大部切除术的胃癌及消化性溃疡患者,随机分为两组,各 40 例。对照组行毕 I 式吻合术,观察组行毕 II 式吻合术。比较两组疗效。结果 观察组手术指标优于对照组(P<0.05);观察组术后视觉模拟评分(VAS)低于对照组(P<0.05);术后半年,两组并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义 (P>0.05);术后,观察组生命质量测定量表(QLQ-C30)评分高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 相较于毕 Ⅰ 式吻合,腹腔镜远端胃大部切除术采用毕 II 式吻合在治疗胃癌及消化性溃疡时展现出了安全性与可行性。此方法能减少患者出血量,加速康复进程,减轻术后伤口疼痛,并且不会增加并发症的风险,有助于提升患者的生活质量。因此,它被视为一种安全有效、利于消化道重建的手术选择。

Abstract

Objective To explore the incidence of anastomotic inflammation and ulcer after Billroth II anastomosis in subtotal gastrectomy. Methods 80 patients with gastric cancer and peptic ulcer who underwent laparoscopic distal subtotal gastrectomy from January 2021 to June 2024 were randomly divided into two groups, with 40 patients in each group. The control group underwent Billroth I anastomosis, while the observation group underwent Billroth II anastomosis. Compared the therapeutic effects of two groups. Results The operation index of the observation group was better than that of the control group (P<0.05). The postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). Half a year after operation, the incidence of complications in the two groups was compared, and the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). After operation, the quality of life scale (QLQ-C30) score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with the Billroth Ⅰ anastomosis, the use of Billroth II anastomosis in laparoscopic distal subtotal gastrectomy has demonstrated safety and feasibility in the treatment of gastric cancer and peptic ulcers. This method can reduce the amount of bleeding in patients, accelerate the rehabilitation process, alleviate postoperative wound pain, and does not increase the risk of complications, which helps to improve the quality of life of patients. Therefore, it is considered a safe, effective, and beneficial surgical option for gastrointestinal reconstruction.

引用本文

按标准格式复制,或导出到文献管理软件
[1]张东波.胃大部切除术毕Ⅱ式吻合后吻合口炎症及溃疡发生率的研究[J],2025,01(04):.