ISSN 2097-5724 CN 61-1535/R 主管·主办:陕西省疾病预防控制中心
疾 疾病预防与控制 Disease Prevention and Control 医学学术期刊 月刊
2026-06-021 临床药物与手术治疗 2026, 2(06): 81-84

“6S”流程模式在急性腹痛诊断中的应用价值

柳州市柳铁中心医院

0下载次数 0被引频次 1阅读次数 9参考文献
知网阅读全文
摘要

目的 探讨“6S”流程模式在急性腹痛诊断中的应用价值。方法 选取2025年1月至2025年10月在广西医科大学附属柳铁中心医院急诊科就诊后收住院的急性腹痛患者作为研究人群,共80例,采用随机数字表法将患者随机分为“6S”流程模式组(40例)和传统模式组(40例)。制定“6S”流程模式组为实验组,传统模式组为对照组。分别收集实验组与对照组患者在急诊科的相关资料(包括性别、年龄、急诊诊断、急诊诊断准确率、急诊停留时间等),对相关资料进行统计学分析,实验组与对照组主要在急诊诊断准确率、平均急诊停留时间、危重疾病检出率、急诊内外科会诊率进行对比。结果 急诊诊断准确率:实验组的85%相比对照组的67.5%无统计学差异(P>0.05),两组平均急诊停留时间比较:对照组90.1分钟明显长于实验组54.1分钟(P<0.05),危重疾病检出率:实验组20%与对照组10%相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),急诊内外科会诊率:实验组37.5%与对照组20%相比未见统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论 “6S”流程模式可显著缩短急性腹痛患者的急诊停留时间,提高诊疗效率。同时,该模式在提升诊断准确率和促进多学科协作方面显示出积极的改善趋势,其潜在的临床价值有待后续大样本研究进一步验证。

Abstract

Objective To exploring the Application Value of the “6S” Process Model in the Diagnosis of Acute Abdominal Pain. Methods A total of 80 patients with acute abdominal pain admitted to the emergency department of Liutie Central Hospital affiliated to Guangxi Medical University from January 2025 to October 2025 were selected as the study population. Patients were randomly divided into the “6S” process model group(40 cases) and the traditional model group(40 cases). The “6S” process model group was designated as the experimental group, while the traditional model group served as the control group. Relevant data(including gender, age, emergency diagnosis, emergency diagnosis accuracy rate, emergency department stay time, etc.) were collected from both groups, and statistical analysis was performed. The primary comparisons between the experimental and control groups focused on emergency diagnosis accuracy rate, average emergency department stay time, critical disease detection rate, and emergency internal and external medicine consultation rate. Results There was no statistically significant difference in emergency diagnosis accuracy between the experimental group(85%) and the control group(67.5%)(P>0.05). The average emergency department stay time was significantly longer in the control group(90.1 minutes) than in the experimental group(54.1 minutes)(P<0.05). For critical disease detection,the experimental group(20%) and the control group(10%) did not differ significantly(P>0.05). The same applied to the emergency internal and external medicine consultation rate,with 37.5% in the experimental group and 20% in the control group(P>0.05). Conclusion The “6S” process model can significantly shorten the emergency department stay time of patients with acute abdominal pain and improve diagnostic efficiency. It also showed a favorable trend in diagnosis accuracy and multidisciplinary collaboration,but its clinical value still needs further validation in large-sample studies.

引用本文

按标准格式复制,或导出到文献管理软件
[1]倪飞.“6S”流程模式在急性腹痛诊断中的应用价值[J].疾病预防与控制,2026,2(06):81-84.