不同质子泵抑制剂联合替戈拉生对胃溃疡的治疗效果评价
甘肃医学院附属医院
目的 探讨胃溃疡治疗中替戈拉生与不同质子泵抑制剂(如雷贝拉唑或奥美拉唑)联合方案治疗的疗效,以便为临床治疗提供借鉴。方法 抽取2023年6月至2025年6月收治的90例胃溃疡患者,采用随机数表法将其分为对照组(45例)和观察组(45例)。患者均接受规范化含铋剂四联疗法,均加替戈拉生抑酸增效,对照组质子泵抑制剂(PPI)选择奥美拉唑,观察组PPI选择雷贝拉唑。治疗8周后比较两组临床疗效、症状缓解时间、血清指标、胃黏膜病理组织学积分、溃疡面积及不良反应。结果 与对照组比较,观察组总有效率更高(95.56%vs. 82.22%),两组差异显著(P<0.05);观察组症状缓解时间短于对照组(P<0.05);治疗后血清指标改善,观察组转化生长因子-β1(TGF-β1)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)水平低于对照组,α-防御素水平高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组胃黏膜病理组织学积分和溃疡面积均低于对照组(P<0.05);与对照组比较,观察组不良反应率稍低(8.89%vs. 22.22%),但两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 雷贝拉唑联合替戈拉生治疗胃溃疡效果优于奥美拉唑联合替戈拉生,能更快缓解症状、改善炎症反应和促进溃疡愈合,且安全性高。
Objective To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of tegoprazan in combination with different proton pump inhibitors(eg, rabeprazole or omeprazole) for gastric ulcer, aiming to provide a reference for clinical management. Methods A total of 90 patients with gastric ulcers admitted from June 2023 to June 2025 were selected and randomly divided into a control group(45 cases) and an observation group(45 cases) using a random number table method. All patients received standardized quadruple therapy with bismuth agents, all were treated with tegoprazan to enhance acid inhibition and efficacy. The control group was treated with omeprazole as the proton pump inhibitors(PPI), while the observation group received rabeprazole as the PPI. After 8 weeks of treatment, clinical efficacy, symptom relief duration, serum indicators, histopathological scores of gastric mucosa, ulcer area, and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results Compared with the control group, the observation group demonstrated a significantly higher overall response rate(95.56% vs. 82.22%, P<0.05) and a shorter time to symptom relief(P<0.05). Post-treatment serum analysis revealed that levels of transforming growth factor-β1(TGF-β1) and tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α) were lower, while α-defensin was higher in the observation group relative to the control group(P<0.05). Furthermore, both the gastric mucosal histopathological score and the ulcer area were significantly reduced in the observation group compared to the control(P<0.05). Although the incidence of adverse events was numerically lower in the observation group(8.89%) than in the control group(22.22%), this difference did not reach statistical significance(P>0.05). Conclusion The combination of rabeprazole and tiglazuridine demonstrates superior therapeutic effects in treating gastric ulcers compared to omeprazole and tiglazuridine, with faster symptom relief, improved inflammatory response, and ulcer healing, along with higher safety.
引用本文
按标准格式复制,或导出到文献管理软件参考文献
共 12 条- [1]赵雅君,张彦.替戈拉生治疗酸相关疾病的研究进展[J].世界最新医学信息文摘(连续型电子期刊),2024,24(9):76-80.
- [2]张志宏,马丽君,张芳芳.不同质子泵抑制剂联合替戈拉生对胃溃疡的治疗效果及安全性分析[J].山西医药杂志,2025,54(12):894-899.
- [3]马治娥,赵文娟,王沛.不同质子泵抑制剂对胃溃疡患者胃肠激素及氧化应激的影响[J].贵州医药,2024,48(1):55-56.
- [4]曹炜伟,王姝娜.不同质子泵抑制剂辅助治疗胃溃疡的疗效及安全性比较[J].临床合理用药,2024,17(21):93-96.
- [5]徐杰安,张建松,张树森.不同质子泵抑制剂对胃溃疡穿孔微创手术后胃肠道功能恢复的影响[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2021,24(10):821-824.
- [6]吕宾.慢性胃炎OLGA/OLGIM分期及其临床意义[J].胃肠病学,2019,24(10):577-580.
- [7]戴书陈,何镔,陆玲玲.何氏胃疡方联合质子泵抑制剂治疗胃溃疡的效果及对炎性因子、胃黏膜屏障功能的影响[J].解放军医药杂志,2022,34(10):89-93.
- [8]杨君,刘芳,臧雷.新型钾离子竞争性酸阻滞剂:替戈拉生[J].中国新药与临床杂志,2022,41(5):272-275.
- [9]赵梦蕊,王沛,王进.替戈拉生片治疗幽门螺杆菌感染的经济学评价[J].中国药物评价,2025,42(2):135-140.
- [10]焦江玉,姜金刚.替戈拉生与雷贝拉唑治疗反流性食管炎的疗效对比[J].当代临床医刊,2025,37(4):60-63.
- [11]蔡珍华,苏吉平,邹佳华.替戈拉生四联疗法治疗Hp感染性胃炎患者的效果[J].中外医学研究,2025,23(8):13-16.
- [12]张孝和,蔡文富.清中汤联合质子泵抑制剂治疗急性胃溃疡出血的临床疗效及对炎症因子的影响[J].中华灾害救援医学,2025,12(5):568-571.
| 文章编号 | 2026-05-033(期号内编号) |
|---|---|
| 栏目 | 临床药物与手术治疗 |
| 作者 | 张亚玲 |
| 作者单位 | 甘肃医学院附属医院 |
| 中图分类号 | R573.1 |
| 卷期页码 | 2026, 2(05): 129-132 |
| 发布时间 | 2026-08-15 |
| 出版时间 | 2026-08-15 |
| 引用信息 | [1]张亚玲.不同质子泵抑制剂联合替戈拉生对胃溃疡的治疗效果评价[J].疾病预防与控制,2026,2(05):129-132. |
| 全文地址 | 在知网查看该文(kns.cnki.net) |
| 数据抓取时间 | 2026-09-22T12:08:20 |