2020-2024年皖西南某市公共场所卫生行政处罚案件分析
安庆市疾病预防控制中心(市卫生监督处)
目的 分析2020-2024年皖西南某市公共场所卫生行政处罚案件情况特征,揭示公共场所卫生管理的关键问题,明确公共场所行业监管重点。方法 从国家卫生健康监督信息平台中导出2020年1月1日至2024年12月31日结案的公共场所案件个案信息,分别运用ExceL表格及SPSS 26.0对数据进行整理和统计分析。结果 2020-2024年皖西南某市公共场所卫生行政处罚案件共440例;案件主要来源于卫生监督检查;被处罚的公共场所类别主要集中在住宿场所、美容美发场所;案由主要集中在“无许可证擅自营业”“无有效健康合格证直接为顾客服务”等。处罚程序以一般程序为主。国家双随机监督检查案件率呈逐年降低趋势,六类场所的案件率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 皖西南某市公共场所案件以监督检查发现为主,住宿、美容美发场所及四类高频案由为监管重点,需通过优化监管模式,有助于进一步强化行业管理提升监管效能,为精准优化监管资源配置、聚焦重点监管领域提供数据支撑。
Objective To analyze the characteristics of public health administrative punishment cases in public places in a city in Southwestern Anhui Province from 2020 to 2024, identify key issues in public health management, and clarify regulatory priorities for the industry. Methods Case information of concluded public health administrative penalties between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2024, were extracted from the National Health Surveillance Information Platform. Data were organized and analyzed using ExceL and SPSS 26.0. Results From 2020 to 2024, there were a total of 440 administrative penalty cases for public place hygiene in a certain city in southwestern Anhui Province. The cases mainly originated from hygiene supervision and inspection. The types of public places subject to penalties were mainly concentrated in accommodation places and beauty and hairdressing places. The main reasons for the cases were “operating without a license” and “directly serving customers without a valid health certificate”, etc. The general procedure was the main penalty procedure. The rate of national mandated dual random supervision and inspection cases showed a decreasing trend year by year, and there were statistically significant differences in the case rates among the six types of places(P<0.05). Conclusion In a certain city in the southwest of Anhui Province, cases in public places are mainly discovered through supervision and inspection. Accommodation and beauty and hairdressing places, as well as four types of highfrequency causes of cases, are the key areas of supervision. It is necessary to optimize the supervision model to further strengthen industry management and improve supervision efficiency, providing data support for precisely optimizing the allocation of supervision resources and focusing on key supervision areas.
引用本文
按标准格式复制,或导出到文献管理软件参考文献
共 11 条- [1]谈立峰,褚苏春,杨琴亚,等.常州市卫生监督“双随机”抽查工作现状分析及对策探讨[J].中国卫生监督杂志,2019,26(4):336-342.
- [2]国家卫生计生委卫生和计划生育监督中心.卫生行政执法文书实用指南[M].北京:中国人口出版社,2018:184-185.
- [3]张庆枝,王勇.2017-2021年合肥市公共场所卫生行政处罚案件分析[J].环境卫生学杂志,2024,14(10):1-6.
- [4]赵欢,汪文毅,钱晓峰.黄山市2018-2022年公共场所卫生行政处罚案件情况分析[J].安徽预防医学杂志,2024,30(4):339-343.
- [5]梁瑞静.2018-2020年杭州市公共场所卫生状况监测结果分析[J].中国卫生监督杂志,2021,28(4):383-390.
- [6]杨松竹.辽宁省公共场所卫生监督量化等级评定规范需求研究[J].品牌与标准化,2020,2020(4):81-82.
- [7]陈永奎,等.2018-2020年胶州市公共场所卫生监督管理情况分析[J].预防医学论坛,2022,28(6):450-453.
- [8]李颖超,张伟,刘文峰,等.2017-2019年深圳市某街道公共场所卫生行政处罚案件分析[J].中国公共卫生管理,2021,37(6):845-848.
- [9]邹涛.卫生信用视角下公共场所卫生监督场景化综合监管方法探讨[J].中国卫生法制,2019,27(6):81-84.
- [10]李永青,靳雪梅.2016—2019年济南市公共场所卫生监督行政处罚案件分析[J].中国卫生监督杂志,2022,29(1):90-95.
- [11]李玉彩.公共场所卫生监督管理方法及价值探讨[J].中国卫生产业,2024,21(15):224-226.
| 文章编号 | 2026-04-010(期号内编号) |
|---|---|
| 栏目 | 预防医学研究 |
| 作者 | 李秋霞 |
| 作者单位 | 安庆市疾病预防控制中心(市卫生监督处) |
| 中图分类号 | D922.11;R-051 |
| 卷期页码 | 2026, 2(04): 37-40 |
| 发布时间 | 2026-07-15 |
| 出版时间 | 2026-07-15 |
| 引用信息 | [1]李秋霞.2020-2024年皖西南某市公共场所卫生行政处罚案件分析[J].疾病预防与控制,2026,2(04):37-40. |
| 全文地址 | 在知网查看该文(kns.cnki.net) |
| 数据抓取时间 | 2026-09-22T12:14:46 |