采样管振荡及静置时间对新型冠状病毒核酸结果的影响
北海市中医医院
目的 探讨各规格采样管振荡方式及静置时间对新型冠状病毒核酸检测结果的影响。方法 2022年12月在北海市中医医院基因扩增实验室制备的552份模拟相同低病毒载量的新型冠状病毒阳性拭子,分别放置于各规格采样管中。统计仪器振荡5秒钟和手工振荡5秒钟两种方式及仪器振荡后立即加样、静置15、30、45分钟后检测的循环阈值(Ct)变化,分析采样管规格、振荡方式、静置时间因素对新型冠状病毒核酸筛查效率和阳性率的影响。结果 手工振荡方式所得Ct值显著高于仪器振荡方式。仪器和手工振荡5秒钟两种方式比较,10∶1和20∶1混采管组相比,单采管其ORF1ab、N基因Ct值均呈升高趋势,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);20∶1混采管在手工振荡5秒试验中假阴性率为2.13%,10∶1及20∶1混采管静置30和45分钟与立刻加样检测双靶标Ct值比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);20∶1混采管仪器振荡静置45分钟新型冠状病毒核酸阳性率为98.9%,假阴性占1.1%。结论 使用10∶1混采管和仪器振荡方式并在30分钟内完成加样,可提高新型冠状病毒核酸筛查效率和阳性率,避免假阴性发生。
Objective To explore the influence of oscillation mode and standing time of sampling tubes of various specifications on the detection results of novel coronavirus nucleic acid. Methods In December, 2022, 552 novel coronavirus positive swabs simulating the same low viral load were prepared in the Gene Amplification Laboratory of Beihai Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, and placed in various sampling tubes. Count the changes of CycleThreshold(Ct) values detected by two methods: instrument shaking for 5 seconds and manual shaking for 5 seconds, and adding samples immediately after instrument shaking and standing for 15, 30 and 45 minutes. To analyze the influence of sampling tube size, oscillation mode and standing time on the efficiency and positive rate of nucleic acid screening in novel coronavirus. Results Manual oscillation mode has larger Ct value than instrument oscillation mode. Compared with the instrument and manual shaking for 5 seconds, the Ct values of ORF1 ab and N genes in the 10 : 1 and 20 : 1 mixed sampling tube groups increased gradually compared with the single sampling tube, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The false negative rate of 20 : 1 mixed sampling tube was 2.13% in the manual shaking test for 5 seconds. There was a significant difference in Ct values between 10 : 1 and 20 : 1 mixed sampling tubes standing for 30 and 45 minutes and immediately adding samples(P<0.05). The positive rate of novel coronavirus nucleic acid was 98.9%, and the false negative rate was 1.1%. Conclusion Using 10 : 1 mixed sampling tube and instrument oscillation mode and completing sample addition within 30 minutes can improve the efficiency and positive rate of nucleic acid screening in novel coronavirus and avoid false negatives.
引用本文
按标准格式复制,或导出到文献管理软件参考文献
共 12 条- [1]石亚玲,区静怡,陈星,等.多种炎症指标在新型冠状病毒肺炎的表达水平及临床应用价值[J].中华检验医学杂志,2020,43(4):346-351.
- [2]王卓,刘宏波,金美松,等.多种类型检测试剂及不同样本处理方式对新型冠状病毒核酸检测结果的影响[J].解放军预防医学杂志,2020,38(8):103-105.
- [3]Zhu N,Zhang D,Wang W,et al. China Novel Coronavirus Investigating and Research Team. ANovel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China,2019[J]. N Engl J Med,2020,382(8):727-733.
- [4]广东省科学技术厅新冠肺炎防控指挥办科研攻关组实验室检测协作组.广东地区新型冠状病毒实验室检测专家共识[J].国际呼吸杂志,2020,40(22):1681-1689.
- [5]中国疾病预防控制中心.新型冠状病毒肺炎实验室检测技术指南[EB/OL].(2020-03-08)[2025-10-11].
- [6]Naqvi AAT,Fatima K,Mohammad T,et al. Insights into SARS-CoV-2 genome,structure,evolution,pathogenesis and therapies:Structural genomics approach[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis,2020,1866(10):165878.
- [7]World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease(COVID-19)technical guidance:Laboratory testing for2019-nCOV in humans[R/OL],(2020).
- [8]张相猛,徐秋芳,施怡茹,等.不同标本前处理方法对新型冠状病毒核酸检测结果的影响[J].检验医学与临床,2021,18(6):729-732.
- [9]徐建男.不同灭活方式对携带新型冠状病毒的物体表面标本核酸检测结果的影响[J].检验医学与临床,2022,19(7):934-937.
- [10]严谨,陈小凤,熊金萍,等.不同灭活温度对新型冠状病毒核酸检测的影响[J].检验医学与临床,2021,18(2):214-216.
- [11]崔学强,李富荣,张伟宏,等.不同因素对新型冠状病毒核酸检测结果的影响分析[J].宁夏医学杂志,2020,42(8):739-741.
- [12]轩乾坤,温冬华,李广波,等.多套仪器组成的新型冠状病毒核酸检测系统的性能验证方案设计[J].国际检验医学杂志,2022,43(7):894-896.
| 文章编号 | 2026-03-039(期号内编号) |
|---|---|
| 栏目 | 检验与方法 |
| 作者 | 彭云娟;黄日昇;吴秋萍 |
| 作者单位 | 北海市中医医院 |
| 通信邮箱 | HRS_9919@163.com; |
| 中图分类号 | R440;R563.1 |
| 卷期页码 | 2026, 2(03): 153-156 |
| 发布时间 | 2026-05-15 |
| 出版时间 | 2026-05-15 |
| 引用信息 | [1]彭云娟,黄日昇,吴秋萍.采样管振荡及静置时间对新型冠状病毒核酸结果的影响[J].疾病预防与控制,2026,2(03):153-156. |
| 全文地址 | 在知网查看该文(kns.cnki.net) |
| 数据抓取时间 | 2026-09-22T12:19:32 |