经皮微创与开放型椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折疗效比较
贞丰县人民医院
目的 分析比较胸腰椎骨折患者分别选择开放型椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗与经皮微创椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗的效果。方法 研究对象选取60例胸腰椎骨折患者,入院治疗时间为2021年1月至2025年1月;经随机数字表法将其分成两组,对照组与研究组各30例,对照组选择开放型椎弓根螺钉治疗、研究组经皮微创椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗,对两组的手术相关指标、不同时段的疼痛程度以及治疗前后的椎体前缘高度、后脊柱侧凸Cobb’s角变化情况进行比较。结果 研究组的手术切口、术中出血量、手术操作时间分别为(8.25±1.36)cm、(90.42±10.85)mL、(65.16±12.81)min,均明显低于对照组的(13.08±1.97)cm、(474.42±17.42)mL、(109.46±19.28)min,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。相比于对照组,研究组术后1周、术后1个月的视觉模拟评分(VAS)均明显更低(P<0.05)。而与对照组治疗后相比较,研究组的椎体前缘高度明显更高(P<0.05),后凸Cobb’s角明显更小(P<0.05)。结论 在对胸腰椎骨折患者进行治疗时,和开放型手术相比较,选择经皮微创手术治疗不仅操作简单方便,对患者创伤轻微,而且患者术后疼痛程度轻微,能对椎体畸形进行显著改善。
Objective To analyze and compare the effects of open pedicle screw fixation and percutaneous minimally invasive pedicle screw fixation in patients with thoracolumbar fractures. Methods Sixty patients with thoracolumbar fractures were selected as the research subjects, and their hospitalization treatment period was from January 2021 to January 2025. They were divided into two groups using a random number table method, with 30 cases in the control group and 30 cases in the study group. The control group chose open pedicle screw treatment and the study group chose percutaneous minimally invasive pedicle screw internal fixation treatment, and surgical related indicators, pain levels at different time periods, and changes in vertebral anterior edge height and Cobb angle before and after treatment were compared between the two groups. Results The surgical incision, intraoperative blood loss, and surgical operation time of the study group were(8.25±1.36) cm,(90.42±10.85) mL, and(65.16±12.81) min, respectively, which were significantly lower than those of the control group(13.08±1.97) cm,(474.42±17.42) mL, and(109.46±19.28) min, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Compared with the control group, the Visual Analog Scale(VAS) scores of the study group were significantly lower at 1 week and 1 month after surgery(P<0.05). Compared with the control group after treatment, the anterior vertebral height of the study group was significantly higher(P<0.05), and the Cobb angle of the posterior convexity was significantly smaller(P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with open surgery, percutaneous minimally invasive surgery is not only simple and convenient to treating patients with thoracolumbar fractures, but also has minimal trauma and postoperative pain, which can significantly improve vertebral deformities.
引用本文
按标准格式复制,或导出到文献管理软件参考文献
共 17 条- [1]倪建平,周国柱,顾军,等.经皮微创脊柱后路钉棒系统固定治疗胸腰椎骨折近远期效果观察[J].中国伤残医学,2024,32(9):5-8.
- [2]陈豪豪,赵国权,蒲兴魏.经皮脊柱微创内固定术治疗创伤性胸腰椎骨折的临床效果[J].当代医药论丛,2024,22(6):34-36.
- [3]Lou C,Lee SK,Ma H,et al. Combined posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation with anterior monosegmental column reconstruction for unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures:an institutional experience[J]. British journal of neurosurgery,2025,25:1-8.
- [4]杨小辉,辛晓锋,姚海峰.微创经皮与传统开放椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折患者的疗效观察[J].贵州医药,2024,48(4):589-591.
- [5]郭杰,于利锋,孙巍,等.经皮与微创小切口普通椎弓根螺钉固定术对胸腰椎骨折患者疗效和炎性因子的影响[J].河北医药,2023,45(4):537-540.
- [6]李天喜,王闯建.后路微创切口开窗减压结合经皮固定治疗伴神经功能损伤胸腰椎骨折的效果及对创伤应激反应、神经功能的影响[J].临床医学研究与实践,2023,8(3):58-60.
- [7]胡中伟,刘耿耿,闫峰.胸腰椎骨折经皮微创与经肌间隙入路椎弓根钉固定术疗效对比研究[J].河南外科学杂志,2023,29(5):57-59.
- [8]Huang B,Niu K,Cheng L,et al. Clinical efficacy and radiological outcomes of a novel screw placement technique for the treatment of traumatic thoracolumbar vertebral fractures under navigation guidance[J]. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders,2025,26(1):896-896.
- [9]高霖,谢勇辉,陈诚,等.经皮微创脊柱内固定治疗对创伤性胸腰椎骨折患者外周血TNF-α、MCP及PGE2水平的影响[J].临床误诊误治,2023,36(6):99-102.
- [10]李佳,朱家星,王磊,等.经皮微创、Wiltse间隙微创入路与传统切开后入路治疗老年胸腰椎骨折临床疗效[J].广东医学,2023,44(12):1523-1529.
- [11]焦小振,张军荣.经皮脊柱微创内固定术与传统后路椎弓根内固定术治疗创伤性胸腰椎骨折患者的临床效果比较[J].临床医学研究与实践,2023,8(16):58-61.
- [12]孙剑波,黄河,李锋涛,等.微创经皮椎体成形术对老年胸腰椎骨折患者干预疗效分析[J].山西医药杂志,2023,52(23):1780-1783.
- [13]李冠军,李晓东,苗洁.微创经皮椎弓根内固定术对胸腰椎骨折患者功能障碍指数、伤椎高度及疼痛程度的影响[J].科学技术与工程,2022,22(22):9524-9528.
- [14]朱建鹏,宫金涛,张印峰,等.经皮微创椎弓根钉内固定与开放椎弓根钉内固定手术治疗胸腰椎骨折的效果比较[J].临床医学,2022,42(4):48-50.
- [15]戴思雨,陈余庆,张科,等.后路微创经皮与经肌间隙入路椎弓根螺钉治疗胸腰椎骨折效果比较观察[J].当代临床医刊,2023,36(6):12-13.
- [16]汪鑫.经皮微创脊柱椎弓根钉棒内固定治疗对无神经损伤胸腰椎骨折患者关节功能、Cobb角及疼痛强度的影响[J].中国医学创新,2022,19(21):51-55.
- [17]叶强. Wiltse入路椎弓根钉内固定与经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定术治疗胸腰椎骨折的近远期疗效对比分析[J].基层医学论坛,2023,27(29):27-29.
| 文章编号 | 2026-03-034(期号内编号) |
|---|---|
| 栏目 | 临床药物与手术治疗 |
| 作者 | 杨兴凯 |
| 作者单位 | 贞丰县人民医院 |
| 基金项目 | 黔西南州科技计划项目(课题)黔西南州科技局,项目名称:《经皮微创与开放型椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折比较》(2023-4-70) |
| 中图分类号 | R687.3 |
| 卷期页码 | 2026, 2(03): 133-136 |
| 发布时间 | 2026-05-15 |
| 出版时间 | 2026-05-15 |
| 引用信息 | [1]杨兴凯.经皮微创与开放型椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折疗效比较[J].疾病预防与控制,2026,2(03):133-136. |
| 全文地址 | 在知网查看该文(kns.cnki.net) |
| 数据抓取时间 | 2026-09-22T12:19:22 |