智能追踪触发和小剂量团注监测技术在肺动脉成像中的应用价值比较
昌乐县人民医院
目的 运用128层螺旋CT智能追踪自动触发技术以及小剂量对比剂团注试验技术在CT肺动脉成像(CTPA)中的应用意义和实际价值比较。方法 选取本院临床怀疑肺动脉栓塞,需行CTPA检查的患者60例,随机分成两组,A组使用小剂量对比剂团注技术(TB),B组使用智能追踪自动触发技术(BT),每组30例。以统一的标准对图像质量进行主观评分,客观评定,并进行辐射剂量的比较。结果 两组患者的性别分布、年龄、体重指数水平基线资料比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);采用40 mL对比剂剂量时,B组肺动脉的CT值高于A组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);同时,A组上腔静脉中的对比剂残留少于B组,两组患者之间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 两组患者采用同等剂量40 mL对比剂,应用TB技术较BT技术的肺动脉血管成像质量高、上腔静脉伪影较少,适用于临床推广应用。
Objective To compare the application significance and practical value of 128-slice spiral CT intelligent tracking automatic triggering technology and low-dose contrast medium bolus test technology in computed tomography pulmonary angiography(CTPA). Methods A total of 60 patients clinically suspected of pulmonary embolism who required CTPA examination in our hospital were randomly divided into two groups, with 30 cases in each group. Group A was examined with low-dose contrast medium bolus test(TB) technology, while Group B was managed with intelligent tracking automatic triggering(BT) technology. The image quality was evaluated by subjective scoring and objective assessment based on unified criteria, and the radiation dose was compared between the two groups. Results The comparison of baseline data on gender distribution, age and body mass index levels between the two groups showed no statistically significant differences(P>0.05). When using a contrast agent dose of 40 mL, the CT value of pulmonary artery in group B was higher than that in group A, and the difference was statistically significant. At the same time, the residual contrast agent in the superior vena cava of group A was less than that in group B, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion With the same contrast medium dose of 40 mL, the TB technology yields higher quality of pulmonary artery angiography images and less superior vena cava artifacts compared with the BT technology, which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
引用本文
按标准格式复制,或导出到文献管理软件参考文献
共 10 条- [1]汤邦贵.肺动脉CTA两种扫描方式应用比较及达峰时间相关因素分析[J].现代医用影像学,2024,33(2):267-270.
- [2]刘杰,原典,张怡存,等.人工智能触发技术与传统团注追踪触发技术在冠状动脉血管成像中的对比研究[J].中国CT和MRI杂志,2024,22(7):83-86.
- [3]刘畅,左晨,许水妹,等.小剂量团注测试技术与智能跟踪触发技术对肺动脉CT血管造影图像质量的影响[J].中国医学装备,2022,19(6):29-33.
- [4]何竹,郑君惠,何兰.基于小剂量团注测试结果在肺动脉血管成像中对比剂用量的精准计算[J].医学影像学杂志,2021,31(9):1484-1488.
- [5]刘云福,康天良,张永县,等.两段式对比剂注射结合团注跟踪技术在肺动脉CTA检查中的应用研究[J]. CT理论与应用研究,2023,32(4):531-538.
- [6]王青云,彭正峰,李兴付,等.改良小剂量团注测试法在冠状动脉CT值稳定性中的应用[J].医学影像学杂志,2021,31(5):881-884.
- [7]于淼淼,赵伟涛,程广婷,等.小剂量团注测试技术与智能跟踪触发技术在肺动脉成像中的对比分析[J].医学影像学杂志,2024,34(10):46-48.
- [8]朱丽丽,郑玉飞.小剂量测试及团注追踪触发技术在肺动脉CTA中的应用价值[J].影像研究与医学应用,2024,8(13):62-64.
- [9]陆福华,赵艳英,薛翔文.小剂量对比剂测试法在心功能不全患者CTPA中的应用[J].影像研究与医学应用,2022,6(17):13-15.
- [10]彭新华,茅杰熙,范晔辉,等.小剂量测试技术在肺动脉CTA中对比剂注射优化方案的研究[J].现代医用影像学,2020,29(1):83-84.
| 文章编号 | 2026-02-045(期号内编号) |
|---|---|
| 栏目 | 检验与方法 |
| 作者 | 李彩琴;刘晓勇;邱鸽;高娜;曾照志;梁付奎 |
| 作者单位 | 昌乐县人民医院 |
| 基金项目 | 潍坊市卫生健康委科研项目(WFWSJK-2023-006) |
| 中图分类号 | R563.5 |
| 卷期页码 | 2026, 2(02): 177-180 |
| 发布时间 | 2026-03-15 |
| 出版时间 | 2026-03-15 |
| 引用信息 | [1]李彩琴,刘晓勇,邱鸽,等.智能追踪触发和小剂量团注监测技术在肺动脉成像中的应用价值比较[J].疾病预防与控制,2026,2(02):177-180. |
| 全文地址 | 在知网查看该文(kns.cnki.net) |
| 数据抓取时间 | 2026-09-22T12:22:52 |