失眠患者使用精神类药物的药学风险评估与效果分析
河北省唐山市宝石花医院
目的 评估失眠患者使用舒乐安定等二类精神药品与抗生素及清热解毒类药物联用的药学风险,分析药学干预效果。方法 选取2023年1月至2024年1月收治的60例失眠患者,按是否实施药学干预分为对照组与观察组各30例,对照组予常规用药管理,观察组在对照组基础上实施系统性药学干预,比较两组患者不良反应发生率与用药合理率及睡眠质量改善情况。结果 60例患者联合用药中存在潜在药物相互作用风险者42例(70.00%),其中高风险8例与中风险30例,实施药学干预后,观察组不良反应发生率为6.67%低于对照组的23.33%(P<0.05),用药合理率为93.33%,高于对照组的70.00%(P<0.05),治疗后匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)评分显著优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 失眠患者二类精神药品与抗生素及清热解毒类药物联用药学风险较高,系统性药学风险评估与干预可有效降低不良反应,提高用药安全性与临床疗效。
Objective To evaluate the pharmaceutical risks associated with the combined use of Class II psychotropic drugs such as Estazolam, along with antibiotics and heat-clearing and detoxifying drugs, in insomnia patients, and to analyze the efficacy of pharmaceutical intervention. Methods A total of 60 insomnia patients admitted from January 2023 to January 2024 were selected. They were divided into a control group and an observation group, with 30 cases in each group, based on whether pharmaceutical interventions were implemented. The control group was given routine medication management, and the observation group was given systematic pharmaceutical intervention on the basis of the control group. The incidence of adverse reactions, the rational rate of medication and the improvement of sleep quality were compared between the two groups. Results Among the 60 patients receiving combined medication, 42 cases(70.00%) had potential risks of drug interactions, including 8 high-risk cases and 30 medium-risk cases. The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 6.67%, which was lower than that in the control group(23.33%)(P<0.05). The rate of rational drug use in the observation group was 93.33%, higher than that in the control group(70.00%)(P<0.05). After treatment, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index(PSQI) score in the observation group was significantly better than that in the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion The combined use of Class II psychotropic drugs psychotropic drugs with antibiotics and heat-clearing and detoxifying drugs in insomnia patients presents a relatively high pharmaceutical risk. Systematic pharmaceutical risk assessment and intervention can effectively reduce adverse reactions, enhance medication safety, and improve clinical efficacy.
引用本文
按标准格式复制,或导出到文献管理软件参考文献
共 14 条- [1]林莹莹,李秀丽,孟倩倩,等.中医药服务联合liberman药物自我处置技术在住院精神类疾病患者中的应用[J].中医药管理杂志,2025,33(1):124-126.
- [2]何卓楠,王丽娟. 2021-2023年上海市某社区失眠患者第二类精神药品使用情况调查[J].中国社区医师,2025,41(18):10-12.
- [3]张鹏,赵忠新.《中国成人失眠诊断与治疗指南》解读[J].中国现代神经疾病杂志,2013,13(5):363-367.
- [4]刘治军,韩红蕾.药物相互作用基础与临床[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2019:1346.
- [5]支晓慧,王晓,刘召英,等.某精神专科医院失眠症患者第二类精神药品依赖影响因素分析[J].药物流行病学杂志,2022,31(9):603-607.
- [6]司晓菲,姜典卓.精神障碍类治疗药物口腔膜剂药学研究探究[J].临床药物治疗杂志,2023,21(5):1-6.
- [7]马明悦,刘燕,高洪彩,等.非典型抗精神病药物联合选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗难治性强迫症的效果与安全性的网状Meta分析[J].四川精神卫生,2021,34(2):144-152.
- [8]王春秀.老年抑郁症患者进行心理疏导和精神护理的临床效果[J].中国药物与临床,2020,20(20):3524-3526.
- [9]卢焕好,许健煌.老年睡眠障碍患者药物利用分析及药学服务模式探讨[J].世界睡眠医学杂志,2023,10(5):1029-1031.
- [10]李苒,宗官桦,姜宇航,等.临床常用精神类药物治疗阿尔茨海默病患者激越症状的网状meta分析[J].临床药物治疗杂志,2025,23(8):21-28.
- [11]周昀箐,李浩,项龙,等.儿童精神类药物中毒的救治及药学监护[J].儿科药学杂志,2023,29(11):5-9.
- [12]张洪标,张传福,李燕平,等.第二类精神药品治疗失眠症的使用状况与药物经济学评价[J].中国药物经济学,2020,15(7):20-23.
- [13]范竹青,高义崧,陈於虹,等.针刺治疗苯二氮䓬类药物依赖性失眠症患者的临床疗效及对其影响因素的Logistic分析[J].世界中西医结合杂志,2025,20(6):1193-1199.
- [14]于景娴,池里群.食欲素受体拮抗剂类抗失眠药物的研究进展[J].中国合理用药探索,2024,21(2):20-25.
| 文章编号 | 2026-02-035(期号内编号) |
|---|---|
| 栏目 | 临床药物与手术治疗 |
| 作者 | 田攀峰 |
| 作者单位 | 河北省唐山市宝石花医院 |
| 中图分类号 | R971 |
| 卷期页码 | 2026, 2(02): 137-140 |
| 发布时间 | 2026-03-15 |
| 出版时间 | 2026-03-15 |
| 引用信息 | [1]田攀峰.失眠患者使用精神类药物的药学风险评估与效果分析[J].疾病预防与控制,2026,2(02):137-140. |
| 全文地址 | 在知网查看该文(kns.cnki.net) |
| 数据抓取时间 | 2026-09-22T12:22:26 |