模块化疾病编码与手术操作分类体系的构建及在病案管理中的研究
南京市高淳人民医院
目的 构建模块化国际疾病分类(ICD)编码与手术操作分类体系,评价其在住院病案首页质量控制和精细化管理中的应用效果。方法 将编码知识划分为标准术语、疾病语义、手术操作语义、规则知识、版本映射及质控分析6个模块,建立“医生源头预检-编码员终末编码-高风险复核-结果反馈”闭环流程。采用前后对照研究,分别抽取应用前后各2 000份住院病案进行双人盲法复核,并各抽取500份病案比较编码时间。结果应用后主要诊断选择、疾病编码、主要手术选择、手术操作编码、完整性、逻辑一致性及疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)入组正确率分别达到98.40%、97.85%、98.10%、97.20%、97.55%、98.30%和97.30%,均较应用前显著提高(P<0.05);单份病案编码时间由(8.74±2.05)min缩短至(5.26±1.41)min。结论 模块化体系可促进质控关口前移,提高编码质量与效率,增强数据的可维护性、可解释性和可追溯性,为病种管理、绩效监测及疾病诊断相关分组/按病种分值付费(DRG/DIP)数据治理提供统一基础。
Objective To develop a modular International Classification of Diseases(ICD) coding and surgical procedure classification system, and evaluate its application in quality control and refined management of hospital discharge abstracts. Methods The coding knowledge was divided into six modules: standard terminology, disease semantics, surgical procedure semantics, rule-based knowledge, version mapping, and quality control analysis. A closedloop workflow was established, including “preliminary review by physicians-final coding by coders-reverification for high-risk cases—feedback on results.” A before-and-after comparative study was conducted, with 2,000 hospital discharge records randomly selected before and after implementation for double-blind verification, and 500 records each were sampled to compare coding time. Results After implementation, the accuracy rates for primary diagnosis selection, disease coding, primary surgery selection, surgical procedure coding, completeness, logical consistency, and Diagnosis-Related Group(DRG) assignment reached 98.40%, 97.85%, 98.10%, 97.20%, 97.55%, 98.30%, and 97.30%, respectively, all significantly higher than before implementation(P<0.05). The average coding time per record decreased from(8.74±2.05) minutes to(5.26±1.41) minutes. Conclusion The modular system promotes early quality control intervention, improves coding quality and efficiency, and enhances data maintainability, interpretability, and traceability, providing a unified foundation for disease management, performance monitoring, and DRG/DIP data governance.
引用本文
按标准格式复制,或导出到文献管理软件参考文献
共 11 条- [1]国家卫生健康委. 2025年国家医疗质量安全改进目标及各专业质控工作改进目标[EB/OL].(2025-03-31)[2026-07-10].
- [2]国家卫生健康委.三级医院评审标准(2025年版)[S/OL]. 2025.
- [3]国家卫生健康委.国家三级公立医院绩效监测操作手册(2025版)[S/OL]. 2025.
- [4]国家医疗保障局.医疗保障疾病诊断分类及代码、医疗保障手术操作分类与编码的编码规则[EB/OL].(2019-06-27)[2026-07-10].
- [5]国家医疗保障局.关于印发按病组(DRG)和病种分值(DIP)付费2.0版分组方案并深入推进相关工作的通知[EB/OL]. 2024.
- [6]国家医疗保障局.国家医疗保障按病种分值付费(DIP)技术规范[S/OL]. 2020.
- [7]谢艳梅.区块链存证一体机在电子病案管理中的应用[J].中国设备工程,2026,(8):43-45.
- [8]魏宏,邢晓玲.电子病案系统在医院病案管理中的应用效果[J].医疗装备,2026,39(7):33-35.
- [9]袁锦萍.以人工智能为基础的病案管理系统优化与创新策略探析[J].兰台内外,2026,(1):1-3.
- [10]王怡.基于DRG的医院病案信息化管理研究[J].中国管理信息化,2025,28(24):218-220.
- [11]王涛.医保DRG支付方式下J省省直公立医院病案质量控制问题与对策研究[D].南昌:江西师范大学,2025.
| 文章编号 | 2026-07-037(期号内编号) |
|---|---|
| 栏目 | 检验与方法 |
| 作者 | 郭丽娟 |
| 作者单位 | 南京市高淳人民医院 |
| 中图分类号 | R197.323 |
| 卷期页码 | 2026, 2(07): 145-148 |
| 发布时间 | 2026-10-15 |
| 出版时间 | 2026-10-15 |
| 引用信息 | [1]郭丽娟.模块化疾病编码与手术操作分类体系的构建及在病案管理中的研究[J].疾病预防与控制,2026,2(07):145-148. |
| 全文地址 | 在知网查看该文(kns.cnki.net) |
| 数据抓取时间 | 2026-11-03T03:31:12 |