脑电生物反馈联合舍曲林治疗青少年抑郁症非自杀性自伤行为的效果观察
安徽省儿童医院
目的 探索青少年抑郁症非自杀性自伤(NSSI)行为舍曲林联合脑电图(EEG)生物反馈治疗方案的效果和安全性。方法 纳入2023年8月至2025年10月收治的122例青少年抑郁症伴NSSI行为患者为主要研究对象,按年龄、病情严重程度分层随机分组,对照组61例,单用舍曲林;观察组61例,在舍曲林基础上联用脑电生物反馈,疗程8周,比较两组治疗前后抑郁症状、NSSI行为改善情况及不良反应。结果 观察组的抑郁症状改善程度与NSSI行为抑制效果均优于对照组,该组患者的儿童抑郁量表(CDI)评分、自伤频率、自伤方式和自伤部位的数量评分在治疗4周和8周时较对照组显著降低(P<0.05);两组治疗方案安全性可控,组间不良反应无差异(P>0.05)。结论 脑电生物反馈搭配舍曲林的治疗方案能显著改善青少年抑郁症伴NSSI行为患者的疾病表现,减少自伤行为发生,不良反应易耐受,值得推广。
Objective To explore the efficacy and safety of sertraline combined with electroencephalogram(EEG) biofeedback therapy for non-suicidal self-injury(NSSI) in adolescents with depression. Methods A total of 122 adolescent patients with depression and non-suicidal self-injury(NSSI) behavior admitted between August 2023 and October 2025 were enrolled as the primary study participants. Stratified randomization was performed to divide them into two groups based on age and disease severity, with 61 cases in each group. The control group received sertraline monotherapy, while the observation group was treated with sertraline combined with electroencephalographic(EEG) biofeedback. The treatment duration was 8 weeks. The two groups were compared in terms of improvements in depressive symptoms and NSSI behavior, as well as adverse reactions, both pre-and post-treatment. Results The improvement of depression symptoms and NSSI behavior inhibition effect in the observation group were better than those in the control group. Compared with the control group the Children's Depression Inventory(CDI) score, the number of frequency, mode and parts of self-injury in the observation group were significantly reduced after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment(P<0.05). The safety of the two groups was controllable, and there was no difference in adverse reactions between the two groups(P>0.05). Conclusions EEG biofeedback combined with sertraline can significantly improve the disease manifestations of adolescent patients with depression and NSSI behavior, reduce the occurrence self-harm behaviors, and the adverse reactions are easy to tolerate.
引用本文
按标准格式复制,或导出到文献管理软件参考文献
共 15 条- [1]Wang L,Liu J,Yang Y,et al. Prevalence and risk factors for non-suicidal self-injury among patients with depression or bipolar disorder in China.[J]. BMC psychiatry,2021,21(1):389.
- [2]曹亚宁,杜亚松.青少年非自杀性自伤与抑郁障碍关系的研究进展[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2021,29(9):1437-1440.
- [3]Ho TC,Sacchet MD,Connolly CG,et al. Inflexible Functional Connectivity of the Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex in Adolescent Major Depressive Disorder[J]. Neuropsychopharmacology,2017,42(12):2434-2445.
- [4]Yujiao W,Xuemin Z,Yifan X,et al. Cognitive Impairment in Adolescent Major Depressive Disorder With Nonsuicidal Self-Injury:Evidence Based on Multiindicator ERPs[J]. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,2021,15:637407.
- [5]林红,刘陈,尹娥,等. iTBS模式重复经颅磁刺激联合氟伏沙明治疗首发青少年抑郁症非自杀性自伤行为的临床观察[J].国际精神病学杂志,2023,50(4):716-718.
- [6]余璐,陈长浩,张栋,等.舍曲林联合脑电生物反馈对老年抑郁症合并失眠患者负性情绪、单胺神经递质水平及睡眠质量的影响[J].国际精神病学杂志,2024,51(6):1781-1783.
- [7]苏鹏,眭朝平,綦航,等.脑电生物反馈联合重复经颅磁刺激治疗伴有非自杀性自伤行为青少年抑郁症患者的效果[J].神经疾病与精神卫生,2024,24(12):844-850.
- [8]田伊瑶,洪素,黄凯欣,等.儿童抑郁量表中文版在重庆市6~13岁小学生中的应用效果[J].陆军军医大学学报,2023,45(3):272-277.
- [9]敖梦琴,罗丹,侯皓,等.父母教养方式的潜在类别与青少年非自杀性自伤行为的关联:情绪调节困难的中介作用[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2025,33(2):254-260.
- [10]张果,李建丰,高超,等.盐酸舍曲林联合认知治疗与脑电生物反馈治疗青少年抑郁症的效果[J].临床医学,2024,44(10):62-64.
- [11]舒昕月,付宝莉,王成.青少年抑郁症患者非自杀性自伤行为影响因素的研究进展[J].心理月刊,2025,20(24):215-217.
- [12]薛延庆,侯延彬,阮列敏.青少年抑郁症患者脑影像学特征与非自杀性自伤行为相关性分析[J].现代实用医学,2024,36(7):911-914.
- [13]朱日霞,曾德宾,林荫. MBFT干预对抑郁障碍青少年心境状态和非自杀性自伤行为的影响[J].贵州医科大学学报,2023,48(10):1260-1266.
- [14]郑鸿伟,刘光伟,张亚莉,等.舍曲林联合脑电生物反馈方法对抑郁症的治疗作用及对血清细胞因子水平的影响[J].临床精神医学杂志,2022,32(6):454-457.
- [15]王源莉,李淑英,杨灿,等.舍曲林合并脑电生物反馈、认知行为疗法治疗首发青少年焦虑障碍的对照研究[J].河南医学研究,2021,30(32):5979-5982.
| 文章编号 | 2026-06-025(期号内编号) |
|---|---|
| 栏目 | 临床药物与手术治疗 |
| 作者 | 胡淑文 |
| 作者单位 | 安徽省儿童医院 |
| 中图分类号 | R749.4 |
| 卷期页码 | 2026, 2(06): 97-100 |
| 发布时间 | 2026-09-15 |
| 出版时间 | 2026-09-15 |
| 引用信息 | [1]胡淑文.脑电生物反馈联合舍曲林治疗青少年抑郁症非自杀性自伤行为的效果观察[J].疾病预防与控制,2026,2(06):97-100. |
| 全文地址 | 在知网查看该文(kns.cnki.net) |
| 数据抓取时间 | 2026-10-15T03:30:59 |