ISSN 2097-5724 CN 61-1535/R 主管·主办:陕西省疾病预防控制中心
疾病预防与控制 Disease Prevention and Control 医学学术期刊 双月刊
2026-05-038 临床药物与手术治疗 2026, 2(05): 149-152

某院丙戊酸血药浓度监测结果及警戒值的设置探讨

浙江中医药大学 2.丽水市第二人民医院

4下载次数 0被引频次 23阅读次数 13参考文献
知网阅读全文
摘要

目的 对丙戊酸血药浓度监测结果及警戒值的设置进行分析和探讨,促进丙戊酸安全、合理使用。方法收集2024年1月至12月丽水市第二人民医院丙戊酸血药浓度监测数据及结果超过警戒值患者的相关病历资料,包括检测结果、患者就诊类型、性别等信息,使用SPSS 26.0对相关数据进行统计分析。结果 2 412例次丙戊酸浓度监测中,女性丙戊酸浓度高于男性(P<0.05),不同年龄段患者丙戊酸浓度呈现随年龄增加而降低的趋势(P<0.05);不同就诊类型、性别、年龄段患者的丙戊酸血药浓度在低于治疗窗、治疗窗内、高于治疗窗的比例差异显著(P<0.05)。93例警戒值中,发生药物不良反应32例,占比34.4%,不良反应主要累及神经系统和消化系统,发生不良反应的警戒值为140.27(127.54,153.77)μg/mL,没有发生不良反应的警戒值为128.08(124.62,137.07)μg/mL(P=0.002);36例警戒值有相关临床处置,57例无相关临床处置,有临床处置的丙戊酸警戒值为142.54(132.36,155.15)μg/mL,无临床处置的警戒值为126.58(124.16,134.48)μg/mL(P<0.001)。结论 临床使用丙戊酸时需考虑性别、年龄的影响,对门诊患者及其家属需加强正确服药的叮嘱和宣教;神经精神药理学与药物精神病学协会(AGNP)推荐的丙戊酸警戒值在实际运用中可能设置稍低,后续还需更多的研究验证。

Abstract

Objective To analyze and discuss the monitoring results of blood concentration of valproic acid and the setting of warning value, so as to promote the safe and rational use of valproic acid. Methods Collect the blood concentration monitoring data of valproic acid in Lishui Second People's Hospital from January to December 2024, as well as the relevant medical records of patients whose blood concentration exceeded the warning value. The records include test results, patient visit types, gender and other information. Use SPSS 26.0 to conduct statistical analysis on the relevant data. Results Among the 2,412 instances of valproic acid concentration monitoring, the valproic acid concentration in females was higher than that in males(P<0.05). The concentration of valproic acid in patients of different age groups showed a decreasing trend with increasing age(P<0.05). There were significant differences in the proportions of patients of different visiting types, genders, and age groups whose valproic acid blood concentration was below the therapeutic window, within the therapeutic window, or above the therapeutic window(P<0.05). Among the 93 alert values, 32 cases of adverse drug reactions occurred, accounting for 34.4%. The adverse reactions mainly affected the nervous system and digestive system. The alert value for the occurrence of adverse reactions was 140.27(127.54, 153.77) μg/mL, while the alert value without any adverse reactions was 128.08(124.62, 137.07) μg/mL(P=0.002). There were 36 cases with relevant clinical interventions for the warning values, while 57 cases did not have any such interventions. The warning value for valproic acid with clinical intervention was 142.54(132.36, 155.15) μg/m L, and the warning value without clinical intervention was 126.58(124.16, 134.48) μg/mL(P<0.001). Conclusion The influence of gender and age should be considered when using valproic acid in clinical practice. It is necessary to strengthen the advice and education of correct medication for outpatients and their families. The valproic acid alert value recommended by the association of neuropsychopharmacology and pharmacopsychiatry(AGNP) may be set slightly lower in practical application, and more research is needed to verify.

引用本文

按标准格式复制,或导出到文献管理软件
[1]蓝梓菱,蓝俊杰.某院丙戊酸血药浓度监测结果及警戒值的设置探讨[J].疾病预防与控制,2026,2(05):149-152.