职业性噪声作业工人高频听力损失分析与预防研究
广东省江门市职业病防治所
目的 分析职业性噪声对作业工人高频听力损失的影响,评估预防性干预措施的实施效果。方法 选取100名接触职业性噪声的作业工人为研究对象,根据是否实施预防性干预措施进行分组,对照组50名实施噪声作业职业健康检查,观察组50名在对照组基础上实施预防性干预措施,比较两组作业工人在干预前后纯音听阈测试结果、高频听力损失发生率、防护依从性、血压变化和心理健康状态。结果 两组工人干预前的3 000、4 000、6 000 Hz频率听阈对比无显著性差异,干预后观察组3 000、4 000、6 000 Hz频率听阈显著小于对照组(P<0.05);观察组的高频听力损失发生率显著低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组的防护依从率显著大于对照组(P<0.05);两组干预后观察组血压值小于对照组(P<0.05);评估工人的心理健康状态,两组干预后工人的焦虑评分和干预前相比均明显降低,观察组干预后的焦虑评分显著小于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 职业性噪声暴露是导致工人高频听力损失的主要风险因素,可伴随耳鸣、血压波动和焦虑等情绪,通过实施系统、综合性的预防干预措施可有效减缓听力下降,降低高频听力损失的发生率,提高作业工人的防护依从性,改善作业工人的血压状况和心理健康水平,对保护噪声作业工人的听力健康有非常重要的临床意义。
Objective To analyze the impact of occupational noise on high-frequency hearing loss in workers and to evaluate the implementation effect of preventive interventions. Methods A total of 100 workers exposed to occupational noise were selected as the research subjects and divided into groups based on whether preventive intervention measures were implemented. The control group consisted of 50 workers who underwent occupational health examinations for noise exposure, while the observation group included 50 workers who received preventive intervention measures in addition to the control group. The pure tone audiometry results, incidence of high-frequency hearing loss, compliance with protection measures, blood pressure changes, and mental health status of the workers in both groups were compared before and after the intervention. Results There was no significant difference in the hearing thresholds at 3,000, 4,000, and 6,000 Hz before the intervention between the two groups of workers. After the intervention, the hearing thresholds at 3,000, 4,000, and 6,000 Hz in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group(P<0.05). The incidence of high-frequency hearing loss in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group(P<0.05). The compliance rate of protection in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group(P<0.05). The blood pressure values in the observation group were lower than that in the control group(P<0.05). In the assessment of the mental health status of the workers, the anxiety scores of the workers in both groups decreased significantly after the intervention compared with before the intervention, and the anxiety score of the observation group after the intervention was significantly lower than that of the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion Occupational noise exposure is a major risk factor for high-frequency hearing loss in workers, which can be accompanied by tinnitus, blood pressure fluctuations, and anxiety. Implementing systematic and comprehensive preventive intervention measures can effectively slow down hearing loss, reduce the incidence of high-frequency hearing loss, improve the compliance of workers with protection measures, and improve the blood pressure status and mental health of workers. This has very important clinical significance for protecting the hearing health of workers exposed to noise.
引用本文
按标准格式复制,或导出到文献管理软件参考文献
共 14 条- [1]张海,镇重,姚永祥,等.基于多水平模型的噪声作业工人高频听力损失影响因素分析[J].中华劳动卫生职业病杂志,2022,40(11):845-850.
- [2]姚玲莉,焦洁,张磊,等.男性噪声作业工人血糖水平与职业性噪声性听力损失的关系研究[J].医药论坛杂志,2024,45(5):502-506.
- [3]王文朋,黄云彪,李钢,等.造船企业噪声所致作业工人高频听力损失回顾性队列研究[J].职业卫生与应急救援,2023,41(2):127-132.
- [4]亢润润,程强,桂方中,等.台州市噪声作业工人高频听力损失及影响因素分析[J].中国公共卫生管理,2024,40(6):859-862.
- [5]叶研,胡丽,胡在方,等.北京市噪声作业工人双耳高频听力损失危害现状[J].首都公共卫生,2021,15(3):172-175.
- [6]胡丽,刘思佳,云水英,等.噪声作业工人双耳高频听力损失与高血压的相关性分析[J].工业卫生与职业病,2022,48(2):117-120.
- [7]潘丹丹.福鼎市噪声作业工人高频听力损失调查结果分析[J].海峡预防医学杂志,2023,29(5):86-89.
- [8]白卢皙,肖颖,段丹萍,等.职业性和非职业性噪声接触导致高频听力损失的交互作用[J].中国职业医学,2024,51(2):163-167.
- [9]刘霞,王炜,孙纳,等.职业性噪声所致高频听力损失与高血压发生风险的病例对照研究[J].中华劳动卫生职业病杂志,2022,40(10):746-750.
- [10]郭亮亮,吴家兵,吴琨,等.某汽车制造厂冲压车间作业工人噪声暴露所致听力损失的风险评估[J].中国工业医学杂志,2021,34(1):55-58.
- [11]尹虹,吴家兵,祁成,等.某汽车制造厂噪声作业人员高频听力损失调查[J].中华劳动卫生职业病杂志,2021,39(7):543-546.
- [12]王文朋,黄云彪,李钢,等.2019年上海某区噪声暴露工人高频听力损失及其影响因素分析[J].工业卫生与职业病,2022,48(2):110-113.
- [13]陈浩,刘新霞,王扬,等.2019年中山市噪声作业工人听力损失情况分析[J].工业卫生与职业病,2021,47(5):391-394.
- [14]焦洁,袁璐璐,李坛,等.DNA甲基化与职业性噪声听力损失关联的病例对照研究[J].中华预防医学杂志,2022,56(8):1087-1094.
| 文章编号 | 2026-04-004(期号内编号) |
|---|---|
| 栏目 | 预防医学研究 |
| 作者 | 方晓阳;覃静;李宗杰;雷森 |
| 作者单位 | 广东省江门市职业病防治所 |
| 中图分类号 | R135.8 |
| 卷期页码 | 2026, 2(04): 13-16 |
| 发布时间 | 2026-07-15 |
| 出版时间 | 2026-07-15 |
| 引用信息 | [1]方晓阳,覃静,李宗杰,等.职业性噪声作业工人高频听力损失分析与预防研究[J].疾病预防与控制,2026,2(04):13-16. |
| 全文地址 | 在知网查看该文(kns.cnki.net) |
| 数据抓取时间 | 2026-09-22T12:14:33 |