不同采血法对血液常规检验指标的影响分析
首钢水钢医院
目的 分析不同采血法在血液常规检验中应用对白细胞计数(WBC)、红细胞计数(RBC)、血红蛋白(Hb)、红细胞比容(Hct)及血小板计数(PLT)的影响。方法 随机抽取自2024年10月至2025年10月在我院行血液常规检验的100例患者作为研究对象,根据采血方法的不同将其分为对照组和观察组,每组50例,对照组采用末梢采血法采集血液样本,观察组采用静脉采血法采集血液样本,参照血常规检验的标准值范围,评估两组患者血液常规检验结果的准确性,并对比两组患者WBC、RBC、Hb、Hct及PLT等指标水平的差异。结果观察组血液常规检验结果的准确性整体高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组WBC、RBC、Hct及PLT水平高于对照组(P<0.05);两组患者Hb水平对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 与末梢采血法相比,静脉采血法在血液常规检验中对WBC、RBC、Hct及PLT检测结果的影响较小,具有较高的准确性。
Objective To analyze the effects of different blood collection methods on white blood cell count(WBC), red blood cell count(RBC), hemoglobin(Hb), hematocrit(Hct), and platelet count(PLT) in routine blood tests. Methods 100 patients who underwent routine blood tests in our hospital from October 2024 to October 2025 were randomly selected as the research subjects. They were divided into a control group and an observation group based on different blood collection methods, with 50 patients in each group. The control group collected blood samples using a peripheral blood collection method, while the observation group collected blood samples using intravenous blood collection method. Referring to the standard value range of routine blood tests, the accuracy of the results of the two groups was evaluated, and the differences in the levels of WBC, RBC, Hb, Hct, PLT and other indicators between the two groups were compared. Results The accuracy of blood routine test results in the observation group was generally higher than that in the control group(P<0.05). The levels of WBC, RBC, Hct, and PLT in the observation group were higher than those in the control group(P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in Hb levels between the two groups(P>0.05). Conclusion Compared with the peripheral blood collection method, venous blood collection method has a smaller impact on the results of WBC, RBC, Hct and PLT detection in routine blood tests, and has higher accuracy.
引用本文
按标准格式复制,或导出到文献管理软件参考文献
共 14 条- [1]师佳妮,刘佳.不同采血法在血液常规检验中应用对WBC、RBC、Hb、Hct及PLT的影响[J].婚育与健康,2025,31(19):55-57.
- [2]丁红霞.两种不同采血方法进行血常规检验在临床中的应用[J].中国农村卫生,2019,11(7):62-63.
- [3]徐晓艳.静脉采血法、末梢采血法在血常规检验中应用效果分析[J].中国现代医生,2019,57(17):124-126.
- [4]任海霞.血常规检测中应用末梢采血法与静脉采血法对检验结果的影响研究[J].中国医药指南,2023,21(16):22-25.
- [5]黄柳.不同采血方法进行血常规检验在临床应用中的分析[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2019,6(81):146-147.
- [6]Zhao X,Liu T,Huang M,et al. Accuracy and stability evaluation of different blood sampling methods in blood gas analysis in emergency patients:A retrospective study[J]. Journal of clinical laboratory analysis,2022,36(11):e24736.
- [7]姚恩明.探析末梢血与静脉血在血常规检验中的差异[J].中国现代药物应用,2020,14(18):47-48.
- [8]任焱,刘江勇,牟昌明.分析静脉采血法与末梢采血法在血常规检验中的应用效果[J].医学食疗与健康,2020,18(2):173-174.
- [9]付强.静脉采血与末梢采血在血常规检验中的应用价值比较[J].中国现代药物应用,2021,15(21):247-249.
- [10]翟金丽.两种不同采血方法在血常规检验中的应用[J].中国冶金工业医学杂志,2021,38(3):332-333.
- [11]佟奎鸿,赵毅.不同采血方法进行血常规检验的价值分析[J].中国医药指南,2021,19(9):126-127.
- [12]陈美霞,陈红玲,罗胜和.末梢血与静脉血进行血常规检验的临床价值分析[J].中国实用医药,2020,15(7):110-112.
- [13]杨明玉,陈尘,刁飞,等.血常规检测中应用末梢采血法和空腹静脉采血法对结果的影响分析[J].医学食疗与健康,2022,20(8):142-144.
- [14]王峰娟.不同采血方法进行血常规检验在临床应用中的研究[J].山西职工医学院学报,2019,29(4):48-50.
| 文章编号 | 2026-03-052(期号内编号) |
|---|---|
| 栏目 | 检验与方法 |
| 作者 | 杨兴海 |
| 作者单位 | 首钢水钢医院 |
| 中图分类号 | R446.11 |
| 卷期页码 | 2026, 2(03): 205-208 |
| 发布时间 | 2026-05-15 |
| 出版时间 | 2026-05-15 |
| 引用信息 | [1]杨兴海.不同采血法对血液常规检验指标的影响分析[J].疾病预防与控制,2026,2(03):205-208. |
| 全文地址 | 在知网查看该文(kns.cnki.net) |
| 数据抓取时间 | 2026-09-22T12:20:06 |