ISSN 2097-5724 CN 61-1535/R 主管·主办:陕西省疾病预防控制中心
疾 疾病预防与控制 Disease Prevention and Control 医学学术期刊 月刊
2026-06-046 检验与方法 2026, 2(06): 181-184

荧光染色法与革兰染色法检测痰标本细菌的对比研究

贵州省都匀市疾病预防控制中心

0下载次数 0被引频次 1阅读次数 10参考文献
知网阅读全文
摘要

目的 比较荧光染色法与革兰染色法在痰标本细菌检测中的诊断效能,探讨荧光染色法在临床痰标本病原菌筛查中的应用价值。方法 选取2024年1月至2025年12月本中心收集的疑似呼吸道感染患者痰标本420份为研究对象,以细菌培养结果作为金标准,同时采用荧光染色法(荧光染料标记细菌细胞壁,荧光显微镜观察)与革兰染色法(传统结晶紫-碘液-乙醇-沙黄染色,光学显微镜观察)进行检测。比较两种染色方法的细菌检出率、灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及检测耗时。结果 以细菌培养结果为金标准,420份痰标本中阳性标本306份(72.86%),阴性标本114份(27.14%)。荧光染色法细菌检出率显著高于革兰染色法(P<0.05)。荧光染色法灵敏度、阴性预测值、准确度均高于革兰染色法(P<0.05)。荧光染色法检测平均耗时短于革兰染色法(P<0.05)。两种检测方法对革兰阳性菌检出率差异无统计学意义,而荧光染色法对革兰阴性菌检出率高于革兰染色法(P<0.05)。结论 荧光染色法在痰标本细菌检测中具有更高的检出率、灵敏度及准确度,且操作简便、耗时短,尤其在对革兰阴性菌的识别方面优势显著。该方法适用于基层疾控机构痰标本细菌快速筛查,可作为传统革兰染色法的重要补充或替代方法,有助于提高呼吸道感染病原学诊断效率。

Abstract

Objective To compare the diagnostic efficacy of fluorescence staining method and gram staining method in detecting bacteria in sputum specimens, and to explore the application value of fluorescence staining method in the screening of pathogenic bacteria in clinical sputum specimens. Methods A total of 420 sputum samples from patients with suspected respiratory tract infection collected in our center from January 2024 to December 2025 were selected as the study objects. The results of bacterial culture were used as the gold standard, and the fluorescent staining method(fluorescent dye labeling bacterial cell wall, fluorescence microscopy observation) and Gram staining method(traditional crystal violet, iodine solution, ethanol and safranin staining) were used at the same time and observed under an optical microscope. The bacterial detection rate, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and detection time of the two staining methods were compared. Results Bacterial culture results were used as the gold standard. Among 420 sputum samples, 306(72.86%) were positive and 114(27.14%) were negative. The detection rate of bacteria by fluorescence staining method was significantly higher than that by Gram staining method(P<0.05). The sensitivity, negative predictive value and accuracy of fluorescence staining were higher than those of Gram staining(P<0.05). The average time of fluorescence staining was shorter than that of Gram staining(P<0.05). There was no difference in the detection rate of Gram-positive bacteria between the two detection methods, while the detection rate of Gram-negative bacteria by fluorescent staining method was higher than that by Gram staining method(P<0.05). Conclusion Fluorescence staining has higher detection rate, sensitivity and accuracy in the detection of bacteria in sputum samples, and it is simple to operate and takes less time, especially in the identification of Gram-negative bacteria. This method is suitable for rapid bacterial screening of sputum samples in primary centers for disease control and prevention, and can be used as an important supplement or alternative method to the traditional Gram staining method, which is helpful in improving the efficiency of etiological diagnosis of respiratory tract infections.

引用本文

按标准格式复制,或导出到文献管理软件
[1]陆云仙.荧光染色法与革兰染色法检测痰标本细菌的对比研究[J].疾病预防与控制,2026,2(06):181-184.