荧光染色法与革兰染色法检测痰标本细菌的对比研究
贵州省都匀市疾病预防控制中心
目的 比较荧光染色法与革兰染色法在痰标本细菌检测中的诊断效能,探讨荧光染色法在临床痰标本病原菌筛查中的应用价值。方法 选取2024年1月至2025年12月本中心收集的疑似呼吸道感染患者痰标本420份为研究对象,以细菌培养结果作为金标准,同时采用荧光染色法(荧光染料标记细菌细胞壁,荧光显微镜观察)与革兰染色法(传统结晶紫-碘液-乙醇-沙黄染色,光学显微镜观察)进行检测。比较两种染色方法的细菌检出率、灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及检测耗时。结果 以细菌培养结果为金标准,420份痰标本中阳性标本306份(72.86%),阴性标本114份(27.14%)。荧光染色法细菌检出率显著高于革兰染色法(P<0.05)。荧光染色法灵敏度、阴性预测值、准确度均高于革兰染色法(P<0.05)。荧光染色法检测平均耗时短于革兰染色法(P<0.05)。两种检测方法对革兰阳性菌检出率差异无统计学意义,而荧光染色法对革兰阴性菌检出率高于革兰染色法(P<0.05)。结论 荧光染色法在痰标本细菌检测中具有更高的检出率、灵敏度及准确度,且操作简便、耗时短,尤其在对革兰阴性菌的识别方面优势显著。该方法适用于基层疾控机构痰标本细菌快速筛查,可作为传统革兰染色法的重要补充或替代方法,有助于提高呼吸道感染病原学诊断效率。
Objective To compare the diagnostic efficacy of fluorescence staining method and gram staining method in detecting bacteria in sputum specimens, and to explore the application value of fluorescence staining method in the screening of pathogenic bacteria in clinical sputum specimens. Methods A total of 420 sputum samples from patients with suspected respiratory tract infection collected in our center from January 2024 to December 2025 were selected as the study objects. The results of bacterial culture were used as the gold standard, and the fluorescent staining method(fluorescent dye labeling bacterial cell wall, fluorescence microscopy observation) and Gram staining method(traditional crystal violet, iodine solution, ethanol and safranin staining) were used at the same time and observed under an optical microscope. The bacterial detection rate, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and detection time of the two staining methods were compared. Results Bacterial culture results were used as the gold standard. Among 420 sputum samples, 306(72.86%) were positive and 114(27.14%) were negative. The detection rate of bacteria by fluorescence staining method was significantly higher than that by Gram staining method(P<0.05). The sensitivity, negative predictive value and accuracy of fluorescence staining were higher than those of Gram staining(P<0.05). The average time of fluorescence staining was shorter than that of Gram staining(P<0.05). There was no difference in the detection rate of Gram-positive bacteria between the two detection methods, while the detection rate of Gram-negative bacteria by fluorescent staining method was higher than that by Gram staining method(P<0.05). Conclusion Fluorescence staining has higher detection rate, sensitivity and accuracy in the detection of bacteria in sputum samples, and it is simple to operate and takes less time, especially in the identification of Gram-negative bacteria. This method is suitable for rapid bacterial screening of sputum samples in primary centers for disease control and prevention, and can be used as an important supplement or alternative method to the traditional Gram staining method, which is helpful in improving the efficiency of etiological diagnosis of respiratory tract infections.
引用本文
按标准格式复制,或导出到文献管理软件参考文献
共 10 条- [1]张玉林,曹彬.呼吸道感染的病原学检测及其临床应用[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2024,47(5):497-500.
- [2]许圣慧,邸沂遥,高耐芬,等. tNGS对肺炎患者痰液/肺泡灌洗液标本病原体检测的影响及指导抗生素治疗的价值[J].中国现代医学杂志,2025,35(11):7-12.
- [3]Ji P,Yuan S,Zeng T,et al. Improving bacterial smear detection with Wright-Giemsa staining:A multicenter study in clinical microbiology laboratories[J]. Journal of Microbiological Methods,2025,239(3):107-116.
- [4]中华预防医学会医院感染控制分会.临床微生物标本采集和送检指南[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2018,28(20):911-919.
- [5]潘恋恋,朱晨,梅勇.真菌荧光染色法与PAS染色法在肺隐球菌病病理学诊断中的比较[J].中国真菌学杂志,2023,18(3):229-231.
- [6]金晓燕,邹珏,张倩倩,等.荧光定量PCR在石蜡标本中检测新型隐球菌的应用价值[J].临床肺科杂志,2025,30(3):366-370.
- [7]王艳平,郑鹏,田敏,等.痰涂片荧光染色法在老年患者呼吸道真菌感染中的应用[J].检验医学与临床,2023,20(4):550-553.
- [8]石兴隆,张济千,魏成喜,等.分析比较不同临床标本微生物检验的阳性率[J].检验医学与临床,2023,20(1):5-8.
- [9]Chang Y,Li T,Niu Y,et al. Comparative evaluation of proteinase K and dithiothreitol as pretreatments for extracting nucleic acids from respiratory samples for multiplex PCR[J]. BMC Microbiology,2025,25(1):1231-1237.
- [10]中华检验医学培训工程专家委员会,中华医学会呼吸病学分会,徐英春,等.成人呼吸道感染病原诊断核酸检测技术临床应用专家共识(2023)[J].协和医学杂志,2023,14(5):959-971.
| 文章编号 | 2026-06-046(期号内编号) |
|---|---|
| 栏目 | 检验与方法 |
| 作者 | 陆云仙 |
| 作者单位 | 贵州省都匀市疾病预防控制中心 |
| 中图分类号 | R446.5 |
| 卷期页码 | 2026, 2(06): 181-184 |
| 发布时间 | 2026-09-15 |
| 出版时间 | 2026-09-15 |
| 引用信息 | [1]陆云仙.荧光染色法与革兰染色法检测痰标本细菌的对比研究[J].疾病预防与控制,2026,2(06):181-184. |
| 全文地址 | 在知网查看该文(kns.cnki.net) |
| 数据抓取时间 | 2026-10-15T03:31:38 |