全血C反应蛋白联合血常规检验在细菌感染性疾病诊断中的价值分析
务川仡佬族苗族自治县中医医院
目的 研究临床诊断细菌感染性疾病使用全血C反应蛋白、血常规联合的价值。方法 研究以2022年10月到2024年10月126例疑似患细菌感染性疾病患者为研究对象,诊断方式分别包括全血C反应蛋白、血常规检验、细菌培养,以细菌培养结果为“金标准”。对单独检验、联合检验的价值展开分析。结果 “金标准”诊断78例细菌感染性疾病,48例非细菌感染性疾病。诊断效能方面,均为联合检验诊断结果高于单一全血C反应蛋白、单一血常规检验(P<0.05),联合检验Kappa>0.8。细菌感染组的全血C反应蛋白与血常规比非细菌感染组高(P<0.05)。结论 联合使用血常规和全血C反应蛋白检验的诊断效能显著,在提高细菌感染性疾病的早期诊断率方面更具优势。
Objective Discussion on the value of combining whole blood C-reactive protein with blood routine in the clinical diagnosis of bacterial infectious diseases. Methods The study included 126 patients suspected of bacterial infectious diseases from October 2022 to October 2024. All patients received whole blood C-reactive protein, blood routine test and bacterial culture. The results of bacterial culture were taken as the “gold standard”. This study evaluated the diagnostic efficacy indicators of single whole blood C-reactive protein test, single blood routine test, and combined test. According to the “gold standard”, patients were divided into the bacterial infection group and the non-bacterial infection group, and the single method for whole blood C-reactive protein detection and blood routine test and combined test of whole blood C-reactive protein with blood routine was compared. Results 78 cases of bacterial infectious diseases and 48 cases of non-bacterial infectious diseases were diagnosed by the “gold standard”. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of combined tests in the diagnosis of bacterial infectious diseases were higher than those of single whole blood C-reactive protein and single blood routine tests(P<0.05), joint inspection showed Kappa>0.8. Bacterial whole blood C-reactive protein and infection group were higher than those in the non-bacterial infection group(P<0.05). Conclusion The joint inspection of whole blood C-reactive protein and blood routine examination has a high diagnostic efficiency in the diagnosis of bacterial infectious diseases, which is helpful to improve the early diagnosis rate of bacterial infectious diseases.
引用本文
按标准格式复制,或导出到文献管理软件参考文献
共 12 条- [1]刘颖,林荣文,陈宏飞.全血C反应蛋白、血常规联合检验在细菌性感染性疾病诊断中的应用[J].质量安全与检验检测,2022,32(1):103-104.
- [2]杨涛,孙荫楠.全血C反应蛋白与血常规联合检验结果评估细菌性感染性疾病的研究[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2023,23(4):100-103.
- [3]孙晓华.全血C反应蛋白与血常规联合检验在儿科细菌性感染性疾病中的诊断作用探讨[J].中国现代药物应用,2016,10(13):43-44.
- [4]史悦.儿科感染性疾病检验中应用全血C反应蛋白联合血常规的临床价值分析[J].中国医药指南,2020,18(8):130.
- [5]王焕成.全血C反应蛋白与血常规中白细胞计数联合检验在儿科感染性疾病中的诊断价值[J].中国实用医药,2020,15(12):105-107.
- [6]宋俊平,樊新艳.全血CRP联合血常规检验在细菌感染性疾病患儿诊断中的应用[J].临床研究,2023,31(9):123-125.
- [7]肖静,司晓盼. CRP联合血常规检查在儿科细菌性感染类疾病诊断中的效果分析[J].中国实用医药,2020,15(32):41-43.
- [8]刘继龙.超敏C反应蛋白检测联合血常规检验在感染性疾病鉴别诊断中的应用价值[J].当代医药论丛,2024,22(15):82-84.
- [9]谢丽玲.血常规联合C反应蛋白检验对小儿细菌感染与病毒感染的鉴别诊断价值[J].黑龙江医药科学,2023,46(6):183-184.
- [10]王淼,张浩.血清降钙素原、C反应蛋白与血常规联合检测在细菌感染患儿临床诊断中的价值[J].中国当代医药,2021,28(24):195-198.
- [11]廉金龙.血常规联合C反应蛋白检验对小儿细菌感染与小儿病毒感染的鉴别价值分析[J].当代医学,2020,26(8):151-152.
- [12]江小梅.超敏C反应蛋白、降钙素原联合血常规检查在儿童感染性疾病诊断中的应用效果[J].中国实用医药,2024,19(18):107-109.
| 文章编号 | 2025-05-068(期号内编号) |
|---|---|
| 栏目 | 检验与方法 |
| 作者 | 吴志远 |
| 作者单位 | 务川仡佬族苗族自治县中医医院 |
| 中图分类号 | R515 |
| 卷期页码 | 2025, 1(05): 149-152 |
| 发布时间 | 2025-10-15 |
| 出版时间 | 2025-10-15 |
| 引用信息 | [1]吴志远.全血C反应蛋白联合血常规检验在细菌感染性疾病诊断中的价值分析[J].疾病预防与控制,2025,1(05):149-152. |
| 全文地址 | 在知网查看该文(kns.cnki.net) |
| 数据抓取时间 | 2026-09-22T12:43:38 |